Dialogue of Civilizations
Renaissance of Classical Culture
Toward a Renaissance of Classical Culture
By Helga Zepp LaRouche, founder of the international Schiller Institute and president of the Schiller Institute in. Originally published in the May 2012 German language magazine “Ibykus.”
What has become of our world? Top bankers are warning about the “apocalypse”—which doesn’t prevent them at the same time from stuffing seven-figure bonuses into their pockets—as if burial shrouds had pockets! Politicians are willing to sell their own grandmothers in order to calm down “the markets,” while the General Welfare which they have sworn to protect, has been erased from their vocabulary. Heads of government who have just finished expunging democracy and constitutional rule from their own countries, are now prepared, under the pretext of concern for democracy and human rights, to march from a “humanitarian intervention” into a neighboring land, straight into a thermonuclear apocalypse.

Featurette
“The Classical Revolution”
What does one do when the state is corrupt, and the masses are apathetic? Where does change then actually come from? Friedrich Schiller provides a truly revealing insight: it can only happen through classical art.
Publication/Archive
“Fidelio” – Journal of Poetry, Science, and Statecraft (1991-2006) Read >>
Beautiful Souls
Musical Dialogue of Cultures
“Musical Dialogue of Cultures” Concert in Berlin — June 25, 2016
Schiller Institute Chorus
“Nänie” by F. Schiller & J. Brahms
The Schiller Institute performs Johannes Brahms’, “Nänie, Op. 82”, preceded by an introductory remark on Friedrich Schiller’s poem “Nänie” by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, demonstrating the necessity of the classical poetry and music as the only means by which the general public can discover the inner source of their own creativity.
Schiller Institute Choruses
Founded with the mission to pursue the “common aims of mankind,” the Schiller Institute’s chorus project, which brings people together from all walks of life to share and present some of the most cherished pieces of classical music, has proven to be a powerful means to that end. Beginning in Manhattan in 2014, then quickly spreading to Boston, Houston, Virginia and the West Coast, our choruses, who practice and perform at the Verdi C=256 pitch, are building a reputation for their lively, rich, and spirited classical performances which include Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Brahms, the uniquely American African-American Spirituals, and more. The best part? We believe that everyone can sing, so come sing with us!
Schiller Institute Chorus
Mass in C Major, Op. 86 by Ludwig van Beethoven
Verdi-Tuning
In the past decades, the Schiller Institute has been the leading edge of the fight to realize Giuseppe Verdi’s wish to bring musical tuning back to where it was when the classical composers lived. The standard pitch gradually been raised to the point where it is practically one tone higher today than it was 200 years ago. Had Bach, Scarlatti, Mozart, Beethoven, Verdi and others wanted to have their works played one tone higher, they would have written them that way. In fact, the specific characteristics of the human singing voice and of the human body, as well as the proportions in nature and the universe suggest that there does exist a scientific tuning.
In the 1980s and 1990s, the Schiller Institute launched an international petition to lower the standard pitch from an arbitrary a = 440-450Hz to an a = 432Hz, as called for by Giuseppe Verdi. The petition gathered signatures from thousands of the top classical singers of the day, including Luciano Pavarotti, Joan Sutherland, Renata Tebaldi, Placido Domingo, Mirella Freni, Monserrat Caballé, Kurt Moll, Birgit Nilsson, Carlo Bergonzi and Piero Cappuccilli, just to name a few. Defense of the classical tradition of “bel canto” singing was at the center of the campaign. As Giuseppe Verdi himself wrote in February 1884, he favored “a single pitch for the entire musical world”, adding that the lower tuning gives the sonority “something more noble, more full and majestic than the shrieks a high pitch could ever give.”

The campaign for Verdi’s “scientific tuning” led to an international music symposium in Casa Verdi/Milan on April 9, 1988, during which the difference between usual tuning of today and the natural Verdi tuning was conclusively demonstrated. It made clear that the principles of music and science cannot be separated, and also that changing the register shifts (passagio) creates a problem not only for the singing voice, but also for musical instruments.
Thus, the optimal resonance of the famous Stradivari violin “Il Cremonese” lies at C = 256Hz (a = 432Hz), as analyzed by the International Institute for Violin making in Cremona. Norbert Brainin, the first violin of the legendary Amadeus String Quartett, who supported the Schiller Institute campaign, demonstrated the contrast between the different concert pitches, including at a concert in Munich’s Max-Joseph-Saal in 1988. Brainin also conducted several master classes with the Schiller Institute in the 1990s on the subject of thorough composition and tuning.
Just recently the Schiller Institute campaign again inspired a number of important initiatives in Italy. In Roncole, Verdi’s birthplace, a yearly festival in the Verdi tuning began last year (www.nuovoverdianeum.it). And the grand-niece of Verdi, Gaia Maschi Verdi, brought her grand-uncle’s piano from the Barezzo House/Bussetto to Teatro Argentina in Rome on June 6, to remain there on exhibition until Dec. 31. This piano (Carol Otto, Berlin) is tuned at a = 432Hz. For more on the subject, see www.teatrodiroma.net/doc/4331/verdi-e-I-italia.
“The Classical Revolution: Return to Verdi-Tuning”
Demonstrations: A = 432 Hz vs. A = 440+Hz
Schiller Institute “Verdi-Tuning” Conference in Ticino/Tessin, Switzerland (May 29, 1996)
by Antonella Banaudi
Schiller Institute “Verdi-Tuning” Conference in Milan, Italy (April 9, 1988)
by Piero Cappuccilli
https://youtu.be/wtMt0qBs8E0




Amazingly well compiled introduction. This project, if well-managed and directed could lead to a great awakening. The key is to have the nature and intent of the program outlined clearly so that Joe Average can understand the incredible good that can come from it and the overwhelming importance of his own participation. Underlying the need for thinking persons to bring forth of their own ideas and creative solutions that stem from the spiritual universal good that is in everyone. This platform could provide the optimism needed for people to become self-conscious, in the right definition of the word.
All of this is really exciting. It resonates so much with my own thinking and writings, even from when I was a teenager. Things I wrote down and the ideas along with them somehow look like they are coming to life in an exciting way. I always new LPAC was great. Too bad most people shy away, not because of the information or the cause, but because of the intensity of the program and the density of the material. People lose sight of the fight amidst the classical curriculum and information that they don’t see as priority. I believe a lot of good organizers are lost because they lose interest and don’t see a positive or big enough response. The people who take a second look at your material are often interested, ask questions and even know a lot of things about the empire or it’s derivitive evils. These people want to take that information and share it and spread the word. These people are important in this fight but they can’t all be converted into intellectual elites, not right awayand especially if they aren’t ready or don’t want to. They have to follow their own path to it, and all good paths lead to that renaissance, but you can’t allow them to be lost because they don’t feel like joining a group permanently or make that leap to total dedication. People need to be given ways to participate without making massive life transitions, and when they see that they are having an effect, they will only become more valuable and effective in this fight.