{"id":83552,"date":"2022-01-03T19:57:15","date_gmt":"2022-01-04T00:57:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/?p=83552"},"modified":"2022-01-05T13:41:18","modified_gmt":"2022-01-05T18:41:18","slug":"interview-with-dr-george-koo-u-s-confrontation-with-china-is-destroying-the-u-s","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/blog\/2022\/01\/03\/interview-with-dr-george-koo-u-s-confrontation-with-china-is-destroying-the-u-s\/","title":{"rendered":"Interview with Dr. George Koo \u2014 U.S. Confrontation With China Is Destroying the U.S."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"U.S. Confrontation With China Is Destroying the U.S. \u2014 Interview with Dr. George Koo\" width=\"860\" height=\"484\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/P5j86d3wY18?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>The following is an edited transcription of an interview conducted with Dr. George Koo, by Michael Billington on December 29, 2021. Dr. Koo is one of the leading Chinese-American writers and organizers in regard to U.S.-China policy and on the conditions of Chinese-Americans in the United States, especially the persecution over these last years of Chinese-Americans and Chinese in the U.S. Subheads, embedded links, and footnotes have been added.&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> This is Mike Billington with the Executive Intelligence Review, the Schiller Institute, and the LaRouche Organization. I\u2019m here with Dr. George Koo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Would you like to say a few words about your own history, Dr. Koo, when you came to the U.S., your education and your career?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> Thank you. And Mike, thank you for inviting me. It\u2019s a pleasure to be with you. I started a draft of my autobiography, and my working title is <em>Best of Both Worlds<\/em>. By that, I mean, of my first 11 years in China, which was in, probably, one of the worst periods of Chinese history\u2014war torn China\u2014I was fortunate. I never saw a single Japanese soldier, and I never lived under the Japanese occupation with all its brutality and inhumanity.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What happened was, my parents graduated from, and were affiliated with, Xiamen University. The leaders of that university, in their wisdom, knew that the Xiamen Harbor was too strategic to be {not} occupied by the Japanese troops. So in 1937, they picked up and moved roughly 200 miles into the interior part of Fujian province. China is very mountainous, so 200 miles is actually quite an appreciable distance away from Xiamen, and as a consequence, the Japanese never saw the strategic need to occupy the area, a very small hamlet called Changting. I was born there, and because of that, I actually had a very nurturing, peaceful upbringing by my parents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I was actually a couple of years ahead of my class in the grammar school. When the war was over and we moved back to Xiamen, I went back a year, because all my fellow students were five years older than I was, because they were interrupted by the war.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When I came to the U.S., I had graduated from sixth grade, which gave me a nice foundation\u2014not only the Chinese language, but also an appreciation of the Chinese culture and Chinese history. I was fortunate. My father had already gotten a fellowship from the nationalist government. They used some of the war reparations from Japan to send some of their students to continue their graduate education after World War Two, and my father was among them. He was in Seattle already, continuing his graduate studies. He was trained as a marine biologist, and was in the University of Washington to study fisheries.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 1949, a lot of these divided families\u2014where the scholar was in the U.S. for further education but the family stayed behind on the mainland\u2014they all had to make a crucial decision, whether they were going to leave the U.S. and go back to China, or they were going to try to get their families to come to the U.S., or they would face an uncertain period of separation. We were fortunate\u2014we were able to emigrate to the U.S. in 1949. I was eleven at the time, didn\u2019t know a word of English, but the Seattle public school system was really, really outstanding. We didn\u2019t feel that we had to go to a private school, so I was brought up through the Seattle public schools. I caught up with my English by the time I graduated from high school.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I was fortunate enough to get a partial scholarship and work program to attend MIT. I went to MIT for my bachelor\u2019s and master\u2019s degrees. I got married\u2014my wife was similarly a Chinese-American who came to the U.S. when she was, I think, six years old. We met at MIT in graduate school. I joined Boeing, worked at Boeing on their Saturn project, and subsequently joined Allied Chemical, continuing my graduate studies, and got my doctorate degree at Stevens Institute of Technology. That\u2019s pretty much the early part of my career.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I joined SRI [formerly the Stanford Research Institute] in conducting what is called industrial economic research. From there, I joined Chase Bank and subsequently Bear Stearns to work on China Trade Advisory Business. For an appreciable period of time, I was helping American businesses doing business in China, establishing business relationships and also negotiating joint venture contracts, cooperation, and so on. From that basis, I developed a very basic understanding of China, how China works, where they\u2019re coming from. As we got later into the relationship, I could see that there was a tremendous gap in understanding between China and the U.S., and I sort of took upon myself the role to help bridge the understanding between the two countries. That\u2019s when I began to write about U.S.-China relations. This is, I guess, what we\u2019ll talk about today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Confrontation Is Lose-Lose<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> A lot of that I didn\u2019t know. I\u2019m glad to learn that about you. You spoke at the Schiller Institute conference on November 13. Your <a href=\"https:\/\/larouchepub.com\/other\/2021\/4846-the_survival_of_our_world_depe.html\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/larouchepub.com\/other\/2021\/4846-the_survival_of_our_world_depe.html\">presentation<\/a> was called \u201cThe Survival of Our World Depends on Whether the U.S. and China Can Get Along.\u201d You noted there that the Chinese economy, by certain kinds of accounting, is now larger than that of the U.S., and that the U.S. response has been, as you said, to \u201cpush China\u2019s head underwater rather than trying to compete on its own.\u201d I concur with you on that. What would you say is the economic and technological impact of that policy, both on China, and also on the U.S.?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr.Koo:<\/strong> It\u2019s unfortunately a zero-sum approach that the U.S. is taking<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">First, it assumes that by taking this approach the U.S. will win at the expense of China, and that China will lose. But what will actually happen, of course, in a zero-sum approach, is that each side will try to endeavor to win at the expense of the other. The eventual outcome is lose-lose\u2014both sides lose. It\u2019s arguable whether China will lose more than the U.S., and the reason I say that is because, China has a much more vibrant, healthy trading relationship with virtually all parts of the world compared to the U.S. So, economically, they have a lot more reach and flexibility.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Second, it goes without saying that China has a very complete, robust manufacturing base, which we do not. We have already emptied out our manufacturing base, and for Trump to impose a tariff barrier and presume that that will bring the manufacturing base back is very wrongheaded. It shows his, I guess, ignorance on the basic principles of economics. I don\u2019t find, and I don\u2019t expect, that very many manufacturing firms will come back unless the economics is basically favorable. And as you know, the justification for the tariff barriers was that it was going to be \u201cfree money\u201d coming to the U.S. Treasury, and the Chinese exporters were going to pay for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And of course, that was far from reality. The reality is the increased prices the American consumers end up paying, so it\u2019s not free money; it\u2019s coming out of one pocket and going to the other. That just raises the cost of living. There\u2019s no question that by separating or attempting to separate the two economic spheres of influence, if you will, that both will lose. I\u2019m not at all sure that the U.S. will come out ahead in a lose-lose outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Ambassador Burlingame<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> You are also the head of something called the Burlingame Foundation, which is named after Anson Burlingame, the American diplomat in China who actually ended up representing China. Could you discuss a bit about his career, when there was an attempt by the U.S. to establish good relations with China, which was at that time under the boot of the British?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> About 13 years ago I happened to catch, in a very small local newspaper that covers the city of Burlingame, that the Burlingame Historical Society wrote about the life of Anson Burlingame\u2014that\u2019s the first time I heard about him, and that the city of Burlingame was named after him. So I read up on it. I was fascinated because, here is somebody who was a dedicated abolitionist, anti-slavery, who placed the highest importance on human rights and human dignity, and was one of the founders of the Republican Party and an energetic, vigorous supporter of Abraham Lincoln, and helped get Lincoln elected. He worked so hard that he lost his own re-election as a congressman from Massachusetts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So, Lincoln offered to appoint him as an ambassador, first to the Austria-Hungary Empire. But the Austrian government didn\u2019t want Burlingame\u2014Burlingame was very vocal about the suppression of the Hungarians by the Austrian emperor, so he was <em>persona non grata<\/em> from the get-go. So then Lincoln appointed him to be ambassador to China. He left the U.S. in 1861, but he took his time, landed in Hong Kong, and travelled up through China gradually so that he could learn more about the Chinese culture, the Chinese people, the Chinese history. By the time he got to Beijing, it was already 1862.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">He made his stand very clear: that China\u2019s sovereignty was to be respected, that he was not there to carve up China for the U.S., unlike the British and other Western powers that were based there. He was very outspoken on what was fair in how to deal with China from a U.S. point of view. In fact, when some American was accused of murdering some Chinese nationals while he was Ambassador, he had him arrested, presided over his trial, and accepted witnesses from China\u2014Chinese witnesses, which was unheard of if you were a British court or a French court or some of the others. He then pronounced him guilty and sentenced him to be executed. (I think he never got executed, because he escaped, but that\u2019s a different story.)&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">All of that very much impressed the regent behind the throne. His name was Prince Gong, Gong Qing Wang in Chinese. Prince Gong was so impressed with Anson Burlingame and his integrity that when Burlingame was all set to return to the U.S.\u2014that would have been 1867\u2014Prince Gong went to see him and said, \u201cMr. Burlingame, we need to go to the Western countries and try to renegotiate the various unequal treaties that have been imposed upon us. We have a team all set to go, but we need someone of international stature to lead this group. Would you be willing to lead it?\u201d Burlingame immediately accepted the appointment, wrote a letter to his boss, the Secretary of State, William Seward, and said, \u201cHey, I\u2019m coming back, but I\u2019m coming back as an Ambassador from China,\u201d and that\u2019s what happened.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">He came to the U.S. in early 1868, took the train that the Chinese had helped to build, the Transcontinental Railroad, celebrated all along the way, got to Washington, and negotiated a treaty called\u2014in shorthand\u2014the Burlingame Treaty of 1868. That treaty recognizes the mutual sovereignty, the equal rights of citizens from one country living in the other, the mutual rights to emigrate from one to the other. It was the first treaty that China enjoyed with the Western countries of that kind, and that set a different relationship between the U.S. and China that had lasting effects, even though the Chinese exclusion laws of 1882 canceled the Burlingame Treaty.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the lasting effects was the Chinese Educational Mission that was organized, I think, starting in 1871. This mission was organized by a guy by the name of Rong Hong, or in Cantonese, Yung Wing. He had been brought over [to the U.S.] earlier by American missionaries, and was a graduate of Yale. When he went back to China, he was entrusted by the Manchu government to be the intermediary between the U.S. and China. He brought a munitions plant\u2014a turnkey plant\u2014from the U.S. to China, and convinced one of the senior officials there that China should send young boys somewhat like himself to the U.S. to get a U.S. education. Through a lot of effort on his part, he convinced families, mostly families in the Guangzhou area, to send 120 boys to the U.S. to be educated. Thirty boys a year were sent over a four-year period.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first batch landed in 1871. They were all 12, 13 years old, if you can imagine.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They ended up in Connecticut, in New England; they were being hosted mostly by Christian families in their area and educated in American schools. Some of them became old enough to attend college, such as MIT, Yale\u2014a lot of them went to Yale because of Rong Hong\u2014and Columbia\u2014and some others of the best schools on the East Coast.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It only lasted four years. The third- and fourth-year batches of young kids never got to finish or attend college, because the internal politics of China became very negative, watching these young Chinese kids becoming \u201ctoo Americanized,\u201d and losing their Chinese roots and Chinese culture. So, they brought them back and interrupted their education. Nevertheless, this group of Western-educated young Chinese later on went on to have a tremendous influence, especially after the fall of the Manchu dynasty and in the Republican government.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of them, who was actually an outstanding baseball pitcher and hitter when he was in the U.S., was appointed Ambassador to Washington. He got to be good friends with Teddy Roosevelt &#8212; he was the one who convinced Roosevelt, by the time he got to be President, that the indemnity funds which the Chinese were paying to the U.S.<mfn>The foreign powers whose missions were attacked in the so-called Boxer Rebellion (1888-1901) punished China by, among things, imposing reparations payments of $330 million\u2014the \u201cBoxer Indemnity.\u201d<\/mfn> could be better used by sending them back to train and educate Chinese in the American system of education.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Some of that money funded the building of Tsinghua University that we now know in Beijing, and also funded some of the outstanding students from China to be educated in the <a href=\"about:blank\">U.S.<\/a><mfn>In 1908 the U.S. Congress passed a bill to return to China $17 million, its share of the remaining Boxer Indemnity. President Theodore Roosevelt&#8217;s administration then established the Boxer Indemnity Scholarship Program to educate Chinese students in the U.S.<\/mfn>, starting in the 1920s, \u201930s and \u201940s, including my father-in-law, by the way. He was sent to get a bachelor\u2019s degree from MIT, a master\u2019s from Pennsylvania, and a doctorate in electrical engineering from Harvard. Boeing\u2019 chief engineer, Wong Tsu, was one of that batch. He went to Boeing, designed the first sea plane, which the U.S. Navy bought, and that got Boeing started. Then Wong Tsu went back to China. There\u2019s a whole list of people which that particular mission created.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now back to Burlingame. After he successfully negotiated the Burlingame Treaty of 1868, he then took the Chinese delegation and went to Europe. He visited the British, the French, and others, trying to convince them that they should do the same. Of course, none of those countries were interested in recognizing China on an equal sovereignty basis. But they also didn\u2019t want to antagonize somebody of Burlingame\u2019s stature. So, they just sort of fobbed him off and stalled. Eventually he ended up in St. Petersburg in February of 1870. There he contracted pneumonia and died within four days. He was a few days short of his 50th birthday when he died in the service of China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This story, by the way, is pretty much forgotten in the U.S. especially, but also in China. But one of the young reporters that he befriended on his way to China was a beginning reporter by the name Sam Clemens, who later on, as you know, became Mark Twain. And Mark Twain wrote probably the best eulogy on Anson Burlingame when Burlingame died.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So the reason for me and some of the others to start the Burlingame Foundation was really to remind the people of the world, especially in the U.S. and China, that there was a point in time in history when the relationship between the two countries was really exemplary, and we would like to see it go back to that basis again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Sun Yat-sen and the American System<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> Yes, indeed. As you know, Dr. Sun Yat-sen was not educated in the United States, exactly, but he and his brother went from the Guangzhou area to Hawaii to work, where he was taken under the care of a missionary family who were part of the Henry Carey School, who had studied the American System of economics developed by Alexander Hamilton.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When Sun Yat-sen then came back to China and ended up organizing the Republican movement that led to the overthrow of the dynasty in 1911 and the establishment of the Chinese Republic, his organizing was based on what he called the Three Principles of the People, which was based on the ideas of Abraham Lincoln, who said \u201cgovernment of the people, by the people and for the people.\u201d In particular, Dr. Sun understood and taught the American System as it was invented by Alexander Hamilton. He even understood the factional differences within the United States, that Thomas Jefferson, although he wanted independence, was a follower of the British <em>laissez faire<\/em> system, including slavery, and so forth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was Sun Yat-sen\u2019s legacy. But that, too, is generally unknown in the United States. So, I\u2019m wondering what you think about the impact of Sun Yat-sen in China and in the United States, how that is impacting things today, because it\u2019s clear that the Chinese economists who are leading the miracle in China today are very, very familiar with this tradition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> Yes, I think it\u2019s fair to say that the influence of Sun Yat-sen, or in Chinese, Sun Zhongshan, continues to be a legacy that is still admired and studied, even in today\u2019s China, even though he was not a leader of the Communist Party movement. However, while he was alive\u2014and unfortunately, he didn\u2019t live very long after the revolution\u2014he wanted to accommodate both the Kuomintang (the Nationalist Party), and the Communist Party, and wanted them to work together, which was not to be, as we know. No question that his Three Principles is taken directly from Abraham Lincoln; he was an unabashed admirer of the American System and democracy as defined by the U.S.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To a large extent, I think, as you said, the Communist Party, since the founding of the PRC [People\u2019s Republic of China] very much did follow Sun Yat-sen\u2019s doctrine along the way. One of Hamilton\u2019s principles was the protection of homegrown industries through tariff barriers, and we saw China do that. They did protect their homegrown industries\u2014they called them the pillar industries. They would protect them from competition, up to a certain point. But they also understand that there is an endpoint to when protective barriers, tariff barriers, cease to be working in their own interests.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A lot of other emerging countries don\u2019t understand that. Once they set up the tariff barriers, they don\u2019t seem to have the ability or the wherewithal to remove these barriers, and the long-term consequences of having tariff barriers forever is to keep your own homegrown industries protected, but never competitive, because they\u2019re not able to compete in the open trade situation. Now, we know that China has surpassed that handicap, because once they joined the WTO, and Premier Zhu Rongji started to remove the protection, it\u2019s a sink or swim situation for the Chinese companies. Those that didn\u2019t make it, that sank, were absorbed in the Chinese economy. Fortunately, I think the Chinese economy grew fast enough to take up the slack of the under- or unemployed as a result of having to face world competition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>War Over Taiwan?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> Let me address the strategic crisis that we\u2019re living through now between the U.S. and China. Ambassador Chas Freeman, who was the interpreter for Richard Nixon on his famous 1972 visit to China and who went on to have an esteemed diplomatic career, is a China scholar and expert. In an <a href=\"https:\/\/larouchepub.com\/other\/2021\/4851-u_s_foreign_policy_is_dangerou.html\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/larouchepub.com\/other\/2021\/4851-u_s_foreign_policy_is_dangerou.html\">interview<\/a> with <em>EIR<\/em> last month, said he thought that the U.S. had gone beyond the \u201cred line\u201d of China vis-\u00e0-vis the Taiwan situation, beyond the \u201cOne China, Two Systems\u201d policy, by backing up the Democratic Progressive Party\u2019s [DPP] policies in Taiwan, calling for independence. The U.S. appears to be sleepwalking into war both in the Russian and the Chinese situations, which could be, of course, disastrous for mankind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> Right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> You\u2019re very familiar and knowledgeable about the developments in Taiwan. What do you think about how Taiwan got to the point that they\u2019re now being used as a lever for a very evil policy?&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> Unfortunately, the party in power in Taiwan, the DPP, probably doesn\u2019t see the situation the way you just enunciated. I think they\u2019d like to see themselves as a tail trying to wag the dog.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Unfortunately, the Biden administration, like the Trump administration preceding it, is encouraging them on that line of thinking. By that, I mean, they are encouraged to push the line in the sand, if you will. I think we\u2019ll have to go back to when the DPP came to power, with Chen Shui-bian their first elected <a href=\"about:blank\">President.<\/a><mfn>Chen Shui-bian served as President of Taiwan from 2000 to 2008. He was the first President from the Democratic Progressive Party which ended the Kuomintang\u2019s 55 years of continuous rule in Taiwan.<\/mfn><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It\u2019s a very strange politics in Taiwan. Chen Shui-bian was elected because there was a bullet that made a right turn and grazed his belly on the night before the election, and also hit his vice president candidate in the knee. It created such an uproar that he successfully got enough sympathy votes to put him over and got him elected. Once he was elected, he changed the core [school] curriculum for grades K-12 and disconnected the Taiwan history from that of the mainland, so that the Taiwan kids growing up no longer know that they\u2019re a part of the Chinese culture, Chinese history, and that their characters and poems and literature came originally from China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So the disenchantment, or this disaffection, of the Taiwan people started with Chen Shui-bian, or perhaps even from Lee Teng-hui, when Lee Teng-hui was President.<mfn>&nbsp;Lee Teng-hui served as President of Taiwan from 1988-2000. He was the Chairman of the Kuomintang during the same period.<\/mfn> Gradually, the people in Taiwan have become more and more detached from any sense of affiliation with the mainland. That\u2019s a very important factor that\u2019s happening here. The other thing is that the DPP has very successfully convinced the people of Taiwan that they are infinitely better off than what\u2019s going on in mainland China, despite the fact that, if they were fortunate enough to go to Shanghai and go to other places, they could see for themselves what a difference it is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In fact, the elites, the better educated, better motivated, which is maybe a couple of million of the young Taiwanese people, are living and working in mainland China, establishing their careers there. A lot of them are working for Taiwan companies that are based in mainland China. They know the difference, but when they go back to Taiwan on home leave, they can\u2019t even talk about it, because the local Taiwan folks would hoot at them and heckle them, and don\u2019t believe what they\u2019re saying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So there\u2019s a dichotomy here between Taiwan and mainland China. Beijing feels that time is on their side. Eventually, the people in Taiwan will recognize that it\u2019s in their benefit to be part of China and not to be trying to be the fifty-first state of the United States of America, which will never happen, even though the DPP seems to be deluded in that sense and that feeling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Is Taiwan a spark? I think Taiwan could be a spark for a war and conflagration if that\u2019s what the United States wants. If the U.S. pushes to the point where Beijing feels that they have to respond, then we will have a disaster in our hands. But as you know, the way the situations are being portrayed by our mainstream media and by our politicians is totally distorted. Whether it\u2019s about Taiwan, about Xinjiang, about Afghanistan, about any part of the world where we have troops and we have bases. Somehow, we\u2019re there to save the world and the Chinese and the Russians are there to destroy the world. Whereas in actual fact, it\u2019s just the opposite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>U.S. Destabilization in Hong Kong<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> You mentioned Hong Kong. I know you\u2019ve been very active in business, as well as just knowledgeable about Hong Kong for a long time. As you know, in 2020, just as there were rioters in the streets across the United States burning down shops, shopping centers, attacking police and so on, the same thing had been going on in Hong Kong the year before, where masked, black-clad young people were driven to go out and set fires and attack police and so on. And yet this was called, in the U.S. press, in regard to he Hong Kong riots, \u201cpeaceful protests for democracy.\u201d So, what is your view of the role of Hong Kong today in regard to China, as well as in its relations with the West?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> I\u2019m glad you brought it up, Mike, because this is a classic example, a fabrication and distortion, of what\u2019s going on in Hong Kong. The riots in Hong Kong started in 2019. It all started because a young Hong Kong couple went to Taiwan and the boyfriend murdered the girlfriend, who was pregnant at the time, and cut up her body and put it in a suitcase, and then went back to Hong Kong by himself. And because there were no extradition treaties between Taiwan and Hong Kong, he basically went home scot-free and was free to roam around the streets. The law enforcement couldn\u2019t do anything about it. So, that brought home the point and the need to have an extradition treaty between Hong Kong and rest of the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In fact, at the time, Hong Kong was one of the few territories or countries that did not have extradition treaties, neither with Taiwan nor with Beijing. So when the Chief Executive of Hong Kong started to enact an extradition treaty, the opposition, the \u201cdemocracy movers\u201d of Hong Kong, objected, created a riot, and insisted that they must not have this extradition treaty, because, they claimed, that with it they could be extradited, they could be arrested and be sent to Beijing at any time, and they would be threatened.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That really created the unrest and the riot. What we found out afterwards, is that those protesters were being funded by the NED, the National Endowment for Democracy, which is a CIA-funded arm whose mission is to create unrest, instability, and disturbance anywhere in the world, in countries where the power that reigns is not to our liking. That\u2019s what happened in Hong Kong. The media not only considered it a democracy movement\u2014one of our leaders, the Speaker of the House, as a matter of fact, publicly said, \u201cWhat a beautiful sight that was!\u201d Well, when the riots happened in the United States, I didn\u2019t find anybody saying that they were a beautiful sight. It was clearly destruction and lawlessness and so on.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So today what we have in Hong Kong, we now have an extradition treaty in place, we have a pledge of allegiance to the Beijing government in place, and we have a voter turnout to elect a batch of legislators for the Hong Kong government. All three things are cause for the Western media to criticize and say this is lack of democracy in Hong Kong. Well, let\u2019s look at it, OK? The voter turnout was very low, was 30%, to elect the legislators. This just happened.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Well, guess what? The normal turnout in New York City is 26%. So, do we say New York City is lacking democracy? Well, maybe it does lack democracy, but certainly you won\u2019t find mainstream media reporting it on that basis. The Pledge of Allegiance? Well, it seems to me, we, in school, pledge allegiance to the flag all the time, and nobody complains about it as being an illegal maneuver. So, we\u2019re looking at double standards, and it\u2019s always to the benefit of us looking good and China looking bad.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Pompeo and BBC Lies About the Uyghurs<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> Perhaps the most extreme example of that was when Mike Pompeo began saying that China was guilty of genocide in Xinjiang against the Muslim Uyghur people, while anybody who would travel to Xinjiang would know how absurd that is. But nonetheless, it\u2019s repeated in every newspaper, in the Congress, and in the White House. What can you tell us about the actual economic and social conditions of the Uyghur population in Xinjiang?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> There is a purpose to Mike Pompeo and his successor, [Antony] Blinken, and the media coverage to emphasize, \u201chuman rights violations in Xinjiang,\u201d to the point that now Biden is actually forbidding Americans from buying cotton from Xinjiang. What is the purpose? Well, the purpose is to keep the Uyghurs in Xinjiang poor and underemployed. And why do we do that? Because wherever there\u2019s instability, that\u2019s what we want. That\u2019s how we, the United States, maintain control. We thrive on instability anywhere else in the world.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I\u2019ll give you an example of a distortion. CGTN, which is the China Global Television Network, had a documentary that covered why China had recruited young Uyghur women to go to work in factories and in cities in other provinces. The idea of employment is income for her, skills for her to make a decent living, raise her living standard to the point that she could even afford to get her parents to move from Xinjiang for a better living. Uyghur women in Xinjiang do not get the proper education, they tend to stay home, marry young, have kids, and never have a chance to improve their living standard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The documentary also showed that the first time that she had to leave home to go to a faraway city in China, she was crying, because this was the first time that she was going to leave home. Well, BBC took that documentary and skillfully cut and pasted so that it comes out with the message: \u201cSee? Beijing is exploiting slave labor again, forcing these young women to leave home to work for peon wages somewhere else.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The same goes with picking cotton in Xinjiang: \u201cLook at all these poor women picking cotton in Xinjiang.\u201d Well, actually most of the cotton nowadays in Xinjiang is done by machines, and the machines are sold by John Deere, a very well-known American company. There\u2019s so much fabrication and distortion going on. Mike Pompeo was actually very open compared to Blinken. Mike Pompeo said: \u201cWe lie, we cheat, we steal\u201d\u2014came right out in the open. Blinken does the same thing, but he\u2019s a little smoother, so he doesn\u2019t say, \u201cWe lie, we cheat, we steal.\u201d But that\u2019s what he does. He talks about, \u201cChina needs to follow the rules-based international order.\u201d What is the rules-based international order?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Well, if you listen to Blinken, it turns out the \u201crules-based international order\u201d is whatever he says it is, not by the United Nations or by a multipolar type of definition. And of course, he has continued to parrot the Xinjiang human rights violations.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I don\u2019t know if you\u2019re familiar with this guy by the name of Adrian Zenz, a German right-wing nut who\u2019s been to Xinjiang maybe once, many years ago, and continues to spout all this fabrication about what\u2019s going on in Xinjiang. You also have this Australian research institute [Australian Strategic Policy Institute, ASPI\u2014ed.] that continues to fabricate reports one after another about what\u2019s going on in Xinjiang and elsewhere in China. We have a deliberate effort on the part of Washington and on the part of Western media to blacken China for no other purpose than to justify attacking and making everything negative, so that the American people are thoroughly, thoroughly brainwashed. It\u2019s not possible for the American public to make a separate judgment. We don\u2019t have any politicians of stature willing to come out and say, \u201cHey, we are going down the tubes if we continue on this path, because we\u2019re going to come out lose-lose. Our economy is going to go in the tank. We\u2019re not going to be benefiting from any collaboration, and we\u2019re not going to solve any of the global problems like the pandemic, like climate change,\u201d and so on and so forth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So, I am very, very sad about where we are at this point. I applaud the Schiller Institute and Helga LaRouche and all the effort that you guys are doing, trying to get the message out. You probably have a better listenership in China and Russia and elsewhere. And somehow, we need to get your voice louder here in the United States.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Democracy for the People<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> Well, of course, their argument is that America is good, and China and Russia are bad because we are a \u201cdemocracy\u201d and they\u2019re an \u201cautocracy.\u201d In fact, as you know, Biden just held the so-called Democracy Summit, trying to create an alliance of countries who are deemed by the U.S. to be \u201cdemocratic\u201d against those that are \u201cauthoritarian.\u201d In fact, the question of what democracy is, is a very interesting and important discussion, and the Chinese have been talking about that. How would you describe democracy in the U.S. compared to democracy in China?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> I think in the U.S., we are very flexible as to what democracy really is. If you\u2019re a country on our side, you have democracy. If you\u2019re against us, you have no democracy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now, what is the example of our democracy? Let me count the ways: Our democracy is where the two Parties bicker, nitpick, and get nothing done. We don\u2019t look at the global issues, the bigger issues of what\u2019s good for our country. We don\u2019t move on infrastructure. We don\u2019t invest in health care. We don\u2019t really care much about education that we talk about. We care about who gets elected. We care about, how to maneuver the election mechanism so that the other side has a disadvantage and we have the advantage. We have people who violate the Constitution and the rule of law, and they\u2019re still walking free, and we don\u2019t seem to be able to do anything about it. These are some examples of democracy as we practice in America.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We also have democracy exercised in that if you live in the ghetto and if you\u2019re Black, you don\u2019t have a chance; you\u2019re presumed guilty of everything we accuse you of, and it\u2019s up to you to prove innocence. And that goes, by the way, for the Chinese-American scientists in this country. We can talk about that a little bit later. But democracy has become a very handy-dandy label, to blacken anybody that we don\u2019t like and to pat ourselves on the back because we are supposed to be a democracy.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now, I can\u2019t explain fully what China means by democracy, but I do know that they respect the human life of every person in their country. They have spent a great amount of effort alleviating poverty for their remote poor, for the villagers who live in some of the worst situations and worst conditions. Admittedly, it may be a propaganda film, but I saw some films of Xi Jinping walking up these muddy trails to visit remote villages to find out how they\u2019re living and how they\u2019re doing. Do they have enough to eat? Do they have warm clothes to wear? Do they have enough blankets, and so on and so forth. He would hold little village conversations with the people and ask them what problems do they have and what issues do they have that they would like to bring up?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is almost unheard of here. Here, when a politician comes to visit and have a town hall meeting, they usually have their hand out because they\u2019re looking for political donations. This whole country\u2019s election is run on money, and if you\u2019re not in a position to write a big check, your voice really doesn\u2019t count. So, there\u2019s a very different way of practicing and exercising democracy, and we\u2019re just kidding ourselves in this country that we all have \u201cone man, one vote\u201d type of equality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Russia and Sun Tsu<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> Before I ask you more about the persecution of the Chinese and Chinese-Americans, let me ask about President Biden. As I\u2019m sure you know, at this moment, the crisis over Ukraine is extremely intense, and yet meetings have been set up between the U.S. and Putin and the representatives of Russia to attempt to deal with this crisis, to guarantee some security for Russia. In fact, it was announced today that Biden is going to talk to Putin tomorrow [Dec. 30]. He also has had several long discussions with Xi Jinping. Do you see this President as having the intent or the ability to try to override this extreme anti-Russia, anti-China hysteria within the press and the Congress, and even within his own administration?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> I\u2019m doubtful that he could, because the situation that Russia and the U.S. is in, didn\u2019t happen overnight. The NATO organization, for example, has been pushing and pushing, collecting members eastward, if you will, from Western Europe to the neighboring countries of Russia. And of course, this threatens Russia and Putin. And finally, Putin had to do something that will catch the attention of the West.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The way he did that\u2014I learned this from one of the analysts from China\u2014is really in accordance with Sun Tzu\u2019s <em>Art of War. <\/em>You negotiate from power and from strength. By amassing Russian troops on the border of Ukraine, it\u2019s sending a very unequivocal message, which is that if we don\u2019t get the reasonable settlement of cease-and-desist of the encroachment by the West, we have the upper hand. We can go in and take the eastern Ukraine at will, and there\u2019s nothing you can do about it. And that\u2019s the fact. I think that\u2019s what the Pentagon realizes and understands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Whether Biden can effectively settle anything remains to be seen, because what Putin really wants, he\u2019s made it very clear\u2014he basically says, \u201cHey NATO, you need to sign a document that says you will cease and desist and not continue to expand your sphere of influence.\u201d I think maybe some of the EU countries would be willing to go along, but NATO obviously is controlled by the U.S., and whether that\u2019s going to happen remains to be seen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>FBI Witch-Hunt Against Chinese in America<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> It\u2019s very dangerous.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So, on the persecution, you know that we\u2019ve been very involved in documenting and opposing the effort by the Department of Justice and the FBI\u2014starting actually a long time ago, but especially under Christopher Wray and the Trump administration and continuing today, with Wray still Director of the FBI\u2014basically accusing anybody who is Chinese working in America, or Chinese-Americans who have any contact with China, are thereby automatically suspected of being spies. There have been some atrocious operations attacking leading scientists, who were helping to solve cancer and other diseases, who have been accused of spying, lost their jobs, lost their laboratories, and so forth. I know you\u2019ve been an outspoken opponent of this, so I\u2019d like you to say what you think needs to be said about that whole crisis in America today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> Again, for Chinese-Americans or ethnic Chinese and to some extent, Asians\u2014because our FBI and our government officials don\u2019t always tell the difference between one Chinese and another Asian\u2014so we\u2019re all being tarred. The system of justice, as applied to us, is justice on its head. You are guilty until you prove you are innocent. It\u2019s very, very difficult to prove a negative, as we all know. When a federal prosecutor comes after you, they have infinite resources in supporting them. You can be driven to poverty from the mounting legal defense bills. Frequently, the hapless Chinese scientists basically have to cop a plea just to get out from under the pressure and get out from the financial ruin that they face.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This actually goes all the way back to J. Edgar Hoover. The bias against Chinese started from him. We had a \u201cChinese expert,\u201d Paul Moore, not long retired now from the FBI, who basically said, if you see three Chinese at a cocktail party, they\u2019re probably talking about the espionage and the intelligence that they\u2019ve gathered. Just any three Chinese, or maybe Asians, could be guilty of spying. This guy used to be the carpool buddy of Robert Hanssen. They used to go to work together. Robert Hanssen, if you don\u2019t remember, or don\u2019t know, was indeed the biggest double agent for the Soviet Union before he was finally caught and sent to jail. He [Moore] never smelled a rat sitting next to Robert Hanssen, but he could see three Chinese standing on the corner as spying for China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Moore also promulgated the \u201cgrains of sand\u201d theory of espionage. What is \u201cgrains of sand\u201d? Well, we have hundreds of thousands of Chinese in this country, and they are loyal to China. They gather any little tidbits of information and they send it to Beijing. The implication is that there\u2019s a supercomputer in the basement of some building in Beijing, cranking through all this little intelligence, through this computer, and out the other end comes the design of the multi-headed missile. That\u2019s the kind of logic that we are facing from the FBI and the Department of Justice. There are even FBI agents that came right out and admitted in their testimony that they lied because they had to fill their quota of cases against Chinese-Americans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I think the long-term implication of this kind of bias is that we are going to lose. And the reason is, because the greatest source of STEM\u2014science, technology, engineering, and math\u2014graduates are coming from China. It\u2019s proven through history that they have made tremendous contributions to American technology, American science, and also as American professors and teachers raising the next generation of students. So we are cutting our own nose to spite our face, because we are discouraging them from coming.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And they are indeed not as enthusiastic about coming to the U.S. More and more of them\u2014I saw as many as 80% of the Chinese students who come in and graduate are now going back to China, because it\u2019s just too damn risky for them to stay here and work here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Belt and Road in America<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> And all the time, the U.S. also is criticizing China for going out to the rest of the world with their development policy, what they learned in transforming their own country from poverty to one of the greatest economies in history. They are taking that to the rest of the world through the Belt and Road Initiative, which you\u2019ve praised often, for trying to convey to other poor countries that the trick to getting out of poverty is building infrastructure and actually creating the conditions for a modern industrial country. You can only think that the attacks on the Belt and Road are coming from those who want to keep the world poor and divided and to keep China down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> Right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> Here in the U.S., our infrastructure is a disaster. We just passed a small infrastructure bill, which will barely dent the deficit we have. What can we do to get the U.S. to accept Chinese investment in U.S. infrastructure, which they wanted to do before this hysteria began? And even more important, how can we get the U.S. to recognize that it\u2019s in its own interest to work with China on developing the real physical economies of nations in Africa and Asia and South America?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> I think, Mike, you made an important summary statement, which is, what can we do to convince the American people it\u2019s in our interest to work with China? There are plenty of examples of the benefit that can accrue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For example, the Hamilton Bridge, which is the extension of the George Washington Bridge that goes over the Harlem River. That bridge was refurbished and rebuilt by a Chinese construction company that was based in New Jersey. That came within budget and on time. It employed American workers. Some of the management came from the China side, but the workers, the employment was good employment for the American workers. And that happened a few years ago. I wrote about it maybe two years ago.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another example? The subway cars in Boston, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Los Angeles are being replaced by Chinese subway cars. These are coming from China, partially in kits, and are assembled in the U.S. The U.S. plant, I think, is outside Springfield, Massachusetts, and there may be another one being built outside of Chicago. The idea was, the state-of-the-art design and the siding and some of the important keys are being provided by China. But the inside air-conditioning, some of the other units, and so on are being provided locally, sourced in the U.S. The content of these cars is about 60% local content, meaning U.S. content, or more than 60%. So, it does qualify, according to the rules of satisfying being made locally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It\u2019s a win-win situation, because these subway cars are state-of-the art. They\u2019re quieter, they\u2019re safer, and they\u2019re more economical. Their prices are lower than third-party sources. In point of fact, in the United States, we no longer have the capability of making these subway cars, so we have to outsource. The other outsources are more expensive than the Chinese source.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When the first car was delivered in Boston, there was a big hullabaloo, a source of celebration. The next targets the Chinese were looking at were New York and Washington. Then the politicians got into the act, and they said, \u201cNo, no, no, we can\u2019t do that, because the Chinese could put in all these listening bugs in the subway car and spy on us while the cars are rolling into work.\u201d Can you imagine you and I having a conversation? \u201cHey, Mike, how are the Yankees doing? You know, do you think they\u2019re going to win the pennant this year?\u201d And that goes to Beijing as espionage? How about that?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Common Good<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> I think one of the primary issues which exemplifie why the world has to work together, is the out-of-control pandemic, this COVID pandemic. As I think you probably know, Helga Zepp-LaRouche and former U.S. Surgeon General in the United States, Dr. Joycelyn Elders, have formed something they call the Committee for the Coincidence of Opposites, an idea taken from the 15th-Century genius Nicholas of Cusa, who was largely responsible for the Renaissance in Europe. Cusa said that to overcome conflicts between religions or ethnicities or nations, you have to think of the higher principle of the common needs and desires of mankind as a whole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This pandemic cannot be cured unless it\u2019s cured everywhere, as we\u2019ve seen by these variants coming back to bite us, because we refuse to build modern health care delivery systems in most countries and we\u2019ve even hoarded vaccines from Africa and elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Zepp-LaRouche and Dr. Elders are calling for is that we must build a modern health system in every country in the world, which would include not just the hospitals and doctors, but clean water and electricity, of which many countries have none. This is certainly the kind of aim that the Belt and Road Initiative is targeting. Do you think this health issue is a means whereby we can overcome this division and geopolitics and get the world to come together for the common aims of mankind?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> Whether we get to the point you just summarized, will require a significant change in attitude in the United States. In China, people seem to naturally understand what\u2019s for the greater good is more important than my individual druthers, my individual \u201cexercise of freedom.\u201d But that\u2019s not the case here in the U.S. We even have people who object to vaccination because it\u2019s an infringement on their personal freedom. If we have the inability to recognize what is the greater good in our own country, we will have even greater difficulty recognizing what is the greater good in solving the problem on a worldwide, global basis.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We\u2019re lucky in the sense that we are richly endowed in water compared to many other places in the world. Therefore, it\u2019s hard for us to appreciate the importance of water elsewhere, whether it\u2019s in Africa or Asia or elsewhere. We are so concerned and care about where we come down on these issues, we don\u2019t even think about the fact that these issues affect all of us and not just in our little circle, our little world of the United States. So, I think the task ahead is a monumental one for the organization, unfortunately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Confucius in America<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> Maybe we should look back to Ben Franklin, who, as you probably know, was a great admirer of Confucius and the meritocracy system in China, and wanted to bring this idea of the common good\u2014or the general welfare, as our Constitution calls it\u2014into the U.S., in building the United States. But as you said, this has been lost in the process of so-called libertarian individual freedom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> Right. It\u2019s way overdone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> Do you think we can teach Confucius to the American people?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> Well, we\u2019re throwing them out. You know, these Confucius Institutes are being thrown out rather than being welcomed at this point. And again, they\u2019re being victimized by the biases that we have here. I mean, we have this Senator from Arkansas [Sen. Tom Cotton\u2014ed.] who says, \u201cHey, we can\u2019t let the Chinese in unless they want to come to study Shakespeare.\u201d And I added, well, they could go to Oxford and Cambridge to study Shakespeare, not come to the University of Arkansas. Maybe they can study how to be a top football team in the AP poll in Arkansas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> Are there other issues you\u2019d like to address to our audience and to the readers of <em>EIR<\/em>?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> Well, Mike, it\u2019s really nice having this conversation. I just feel so disappointed on the path the United States is taking at this point. We seem to be insatiable in wanting to pick fights. We seem to need a common adversary to justify our military budgets. There is only one issue that has overwhelming bipartisan support in this country, and that is increasing the military budget.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You have to ask, the American people need to ask: Why do we need an increased military budget? We can blow the world apart many times over with what we\u2019ve got. What\u2019s the point of intimidating everybody else? By intimidation, we think that we have other countries on our side. Actually, most countries fear us but do not like us, and do not admire what we\u2019re doing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That\u2019s why I\u2019m so glad we\u2019re having this conversation. I just wish that we can help turn some people around, and encourage not just thought leaders, but politicians, to understand what\u2019s at stake and start to speak out on what would be sensible and in the interests of our country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>EIR:<\/strong> Thank you very much; I appreciate this discussion. I think it should have ramifications throughout our country and hopefully around the world, that we can change America. I thank you again for doing our interview.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dr. Koo:<\/strong> It\u2019s been a pleasure. Mike, thank you for inviting me.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The following is an edited transcription of an interview conducted with Dr. George Koo, by Michael Billington on December 29, 2021. Dr. Koo is one of the leading Chinese-American writers and organizers in regard to U.S.-China policy and on the conditions of Chinese-Americans in the United States, especially the persecution over these last years of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":83553,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[842],"class_list":["post-83552","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-allgemein","tag-lang-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83552","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83552"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83552\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83594,"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83552\/revisions\/83594"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/83553"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2.schillermeet.de\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}